Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3273 13
Original file (NR3273 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JBH
Docket No. NR3273-13
27 March 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: Se : |
Se en natal

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Weight tickets and associated documents
(3) Separation Order, NAVMC 11060 9 March 2012
(4) HOMC Memo 4050 LPD-2 dated 13 June 2013

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected to establish eligibility for reimbursement
of a self-procured household goods move.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 16 July 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined by
majority vote that the corrective action indicated below should
be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, reguiations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
Docket No. NR3273-13

b. On 1 September 2011 Petitioner was approved for an
early early under the FY lz Enlisted Early Release Program.

c. After petitioner was approved for early release he
reported to the Traffic Management Office (TMO) at Marine Corps
Air Station (MCAS) Beaufort.

dG. Petitioner claims that he was counseled by an HHG
Counsellor that he could complete the HHG move and be
reimbursed.

e. On 11 November 2011 Petitioner executed a personally
procured Household Goods (HHG} Move.

f. Petitioner claims that he reported back to the TMO and
was informed that he could not be reimbursed for his move
because he moved prior to separations orders being issued.

g. Funding for the Petitioner’s separation orders was not
issued until 9 March 2012.

h. In November 2012, Petitioner submitted an application
to this Board. Petitioner seeks to have the record changed to
show that his orders were issued before his household goods move
in order to make a claim for reimbursement of travel expenses.
Petitioner claims that he was counseled by the local TMO that he
could make the move and then be reimbursed when the separations
orders were issued.

h. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4),
Headquarters Marine Corps (Code LPD2) has recommended the
request be denied for the following reasons. The member
conducted a Personally Procured Move prior to receiving
separation orders and Petitioner did not meet the requirements
outlined in the Joint Federal Travel Regulations to be
reimbursed for the Personally Procured Move using his Separation
orders.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
majority of the Board, concluded that Petitioner’s request
warrants favorable action. The Board carefully weighed the
observations made in enclosure (4). The Board found that, while
there is no evidence of an error, as a general matter of equity,
Docket No. NR3273-13

the Marine Corps should pay for a separating member’s final
household goods move, even if the member moved himseif
‘prematurely and without proper advance authorization.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
to show that:

a. Petitioner’s separation orders were issued prior to
11 November 2011.

b. Petitioner is authorized reimbursement for the self-
procured household goods move he made on approximately
11 November 2011. Reimbursement shall be governed by the
standard policies and regulations that apply to other self-
procured household goods moves made in conjunction with
separation from active duty.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled

matter.
ROBERT D. “ASALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your

review and action.
Se ED i po

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director

The r mendation is reviewed and approved:

Ui aj

ROBERT L. WOODS
Assistant General Counsel -
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs)

1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 4D548 |
Washington, DC 20350-1000

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0296 13

    Original file (NR0296 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 July 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined by majority vote that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Commander, Navy Personnel Command disapproved the request for early separation on 25 June 2012. e. Petitioner’s spouse conducted a Personally Procured Household Goods Move (PPM) on 27 July 2012. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02500

    Original file (BC 2013 02500.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the necessary documentation for approval of the personally procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) during a permanent change of station (PCS) move. ECAF states the applicant indicates he should be reimbursed for three primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03947

    Original file (BC-2012-03947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/CCC recommends approval. Based on information in the case file, it appears erroneous information received regarding authorization for shipment prior to issuance of orders resulted in an injustice against the applicant, and their office concurs that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11082-09

    Original file (11082-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEC Docket No. i. Petitioner's application was staffed to the following offices within the Navy for review and comment: The Navy Personnel Command (PERS 41), the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO Code N130), and the Navy Supply System's Command (NAVSUPSYSCMD) . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00423

    Original file (BC-2013-00423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His PCS order was issued on 10 August 2012. When he attempted to file his paperwork with the TMO he was told that he was not entitled, as the shipment was made prior to issuance of the PCS order. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority issued a Letter-in-Lieu of order dated 20 July 2012, and the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06353-10

    Original file (06353-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Lcc Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should he taken on the available evidence of record. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328

    Original file (20120006328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05550-07

    Original file (05550-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to travel of dependents and shipment of household goods (HHG) when he was sent on 560 days Temporary Additional Duty.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Lucas, Mann, and Storz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2007 and, pursuant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02781

    Original file (BC 2010 02781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The JFTR only authorizes transportation of HHG prior to the issuance of orders if a request for transportation is initiated and supported by: 1) a statement from the authorizing official that the order would be issued (general information concerning order issuance before determination is made to actually issue the order, such as time of eventual release from active duty is not advice that the order is to be issued), 2) a written agreement signed by the applicant to pay any additional costs...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02208-11

    Original file (02208-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his transfer orders were issued prior to 12 November 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...